Skip to main content

Research Stars

The factors that influence the intention to use e-commerce in the context of components drawn from the intentional use model, theory of planned behavior, and technology acceptance model. The Scholar collected data from a field study in some regions of Telangana, India. For this purpose, a structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis was performed using SMART PLS. Questionnaires were adopted from the final study, and a non-probabilistic qualitative sampling method was used to obtain information. This study ensured the usefulness of the data before conducting path analysis and bootstrapping. The results of this study show that the existing TPB constructs emerged as the primary determinants of the e-commerce intention of consumers in Telangana. However, ease of use and usefulness are not as important as the TAM model variables. The study recommends that e-commerce advocates create an environment that allows consumers to build trust, feel secure in transactions, and be exposed to informative campaigns promoting e-commerce. These initiatives will go a long way in addressing the key variables influencing consumer attitudes towards e-commerce and encouraging better usage behavior among consumers.

International Research Stars

Volume 5, Issue 2, 2026

The "Phygital" Campus: A Conceptual Model for Balancing Faculty Well-being and Institutional Growth in Emerging Economies

M. Muni jyothish Kumar , and Dr M Jayalakshmi

1. *M. Muni jyothish Kumar  ,  Assistant Professor, Siddharth Institute of Engineering and Technology, Puttur, Andhra Pradesh. India.

E-mail:  munijyothish@gmail.com,   https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1050-4562?lang=en

2.Dr M Jayalakshmi  ,  Professor & HoD, Siddharth Institute of Engineering and Technology, Puttur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 

E-mail: mjayalakshmi@siddharthgroup.ac.in. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9693-7329

Research Article

Open Access

A strong, successful business has a strong pillar; there are Business Ethics and Corporate governance practices. These support the firm’s performance and sustainable development. The significance of business ethics and corporate governance practices increased from 1984. The purpose of the review analysis is to know the literature publication trend, top authors, source pages, institutions, and nation. Additionally, it will focus on keyword occurrence to understand the research gap in present and future research. In this study, metadata was collected from keyword usage with inclusion and exclusion criteria and a systematic literature approach for metadata identification. The current study utilised 602 Scopus metadata from 1984 to 2024 and Vos-viewer software for the bibliometric analysis. The Scopus metadata reviewed the top 15 authors, institutions, nations and funding sources. Finally, keyword occurrence was extracted to six clusters. It helps to identify individual cluster-based research gaps, study types with focused areas, and theoretical study recommendations. This bibliometric analysis recommends a strong foundation for the research gap from the Scopus metadata. It covers only selected keywords, the research subject area, and 1984 to 2024.

Bibliometric reviews,

Business Ethics,

Governance,

Cluster analysis

  1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://www.emerald.com/jmp/article-abstract/22/3/309/236386/The-Job-Demands-Resources-model-state-of-the-art?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  2. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
  1. Batat, W., & Hammedi, W. (2023). The extended reality technology (ERT) framework for designing customer and service experiences in phygital settings: A service research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 34(1), 10–33. https://www.emerald.com/josm/article-abstract/34/1/10/227968/The-extended-reality-technology-ERT-framework-for?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  2. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/462
  3. Cao, C., Shang, L., & Meng, Q. (2020). Applying the job demands-resources model to exploring predictors of innovative teaching among university teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103009
  4. Castro Benavides, L. M., et al. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(8), 3291. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3291
  5. Chaturvedi, S., Purohit, S., & Verma, M. (2021). Effective teaching practices for success during COVID-19 pandemic: Towards phygital learning. Frontiers in Education, 6, 646557. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.646557/full
  6. Demerouti, E. (2025). Job demands-resources and conservation of resources theories: How do they help to explain employee well-being and future job design? Journal of Business Research, 192, 115296. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001195?via%3Dihub
  7. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Coombs, C., Constantiou, I., Duan, Y., Edwards, J., Gupta, B., Lal, B., Misra, S., Prashant, P., Raman, R., Rana, N., Sharma, S., & Upadhyay, N. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211
  8. Li, L., Turel, O., & Xu, F. (2023). Towards a bright side of technostress in higher education teachers. Technology in Society, 75, 102428. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378637633_Towards_a_bright_side_of_technostress_in_higher_education_teachers_Identifying_several_antecedents_and_outcomes_of_techno-eustress
  9. Lillelien, K., & Jensen, M. T. (2025). Digital and digitized interventions for teachers’ professional well-being. Education Sciences, 15(7), 799. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/7/799
  10. Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Does teacher burnout affect students? Educational Research Review, 33, 100388.

            https://tinyurl.com/28hp5muf

  1. Omohundro, S. (2014). Autonomous technology and the greater human good. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 26(3), 303–315. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0952813X.2014.895111
  2. Ossiannilsson, E. S. (2022). Resilient agile education for lifelong learning post-pandemic to meet the United Nations sustainability goals. Sustainability, 14(16), 10376 https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10376
  3. Passey, D., Shonfeld, M., Appleby, L., Judge, M., Saito, T., & Smits, A. (2018). Digital agency: Empowering equity in and through education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 425–439. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10758-018-9384-x
  4. Patrício, V., Costa, R. L. D., Carvalho, H., Pereira, L., Dias, Á., & Gonçalves, R. (2022). Investigation model of sensing, seizing and reconfiguring capabilities. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 13(4), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVCM.2022.10051842
  5. Prabhakar, G. V., Reddy, P. R., Savinkina, L. A., Gantasala, S. B., & Ankireddy, S. (2018). Influence of organisational culture dimensions on knowledge management processes in higher educational institutions. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 9(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2018.088389
  6. Ramachandran, S., Ugokwe, C. K., Latiff, K., & Ibrahim, M. R. (2024). Continued innovation beyond COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Tourism Futures. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-10-2023-0221
  7. Sato, Y., & Araki, Y. (2017). Trust in digitally rich learning environments. Technology in Society, 48, 70–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.11.001
  8. Siddiq, F., Røkenes, F. M., Lund, A., & Scherer, R. (2024). New kid on the block? A conceptual systematic review of digital agency. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 5721–5752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12038-3
  9. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  10. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

APA Reference:
M. Muni jyothish Kumar, and Dr M Jayalakshmi  (2026); The “Phygital” Campus: A Conceptual Model for Balancing Faculty Well-being and Institutional Growth in Emerging Economies, International Research Stars, ISSN: 2583-276X, V5, I2, Pp: 1-11.