International Research Stars
Volume 4, Issue 3, 2025
A STUDY ON ASPECTS MOTIVATING THE USE OF BALANCE SCORECARD IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECTOR IN BENGALURU
Shalini.S and Dr. S. Venkatesh*
Author Information
1. Shalini.S 
, Assistant Professor, Institute of Management, Kristu Jayanti University.
2. S. Venkatesh* Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, School of Law, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University, Tiruchirapalli.
Article Information
The Balanced Scorecard, often known as the BSC, is a valuable measuring and strategic management control tool that will help to achieve the desired results. The primary purpose of BSC is to teach employees about organizational plans and to support employees in putting those goals into action; nevertheless, the use of BSC for performance assessment is being influenced by a variety of issues. Balanced scorecard usage in the information technology industry is influenced by several criteria, including ease of use, usefulness, control system, and evaluation style. There is a significant gap between the elements that influence the usage of balance scorecard in the information technology industry and the employees’ profiles. The decision-making process is being considerably influenced in a favorable way by aspects such as usefulness, ease of use, control system, and evaluation style. As a result, the implementation of balanced scorecard should also be supported by developing them in such a way that they coordinate with many other control systems and assessment styles that are used in IT organizations.
Balance Scorecard,
Decision Making,
IT Sector
- Bahl, S., & Wali, O. P. (2013). An empirical analysis of perceived significance of information security service quality to predict the organisational performance in software service industry. CSI transactions on ICT, 1(3), 221-230.
- Bentes, A. V., Carneiro, J., da Silva, J. F., & Kimura, H. (2012). Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP. Journal of business research, 65(12), 1790-1799.
- Ghodeswar, B., & Vaidyanathan, J. (2008). Business process outsourcing: an approach to gain access to world‐class capabilities. Business process management journal, 14(1), 23-38.
- Lauras, M., Marques, G., & Gourc, D. (2010). Towards a multi-dimensional project Performance Measurement System. Decision Support Systems, 48(2), 342-353.
- Martinsons, M., Davison, R., & Tse, D. (1999). The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision support systems, 25(1), 71-88.
- Nguyen, L. G. T., & Pham, H. T. (2020). Factors affecting employee engagement at not-for-profit organizations: A case in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 495-507.
- Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long‐term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic management journal, 37(8), 1615-1631.
- Papalexandris, A., Ioannou, G., Prastacos, G., & Soderquist, K. E. (2005). An integrated methodology for putting the balanced scorecard into action. European management journal, 23(2), 214-227.
- Ritchie, W. J., Ni, J., Stark, E. M., & Melnyk, S. A. (2019). The effectiveness of ISO 9001-based healthcare accreditation surveyors and standards on hospital performance outcomes: A balanced scorecard perspective. Quality Management Journal, 26(4), 162-173.
- Spanò, R., Sarto, F., Caldarelli, A., & Viganò, R. (2016). Innovation & performance measurement: An adapted balanced scorecard. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(6), 194-204.
APA Reference:
Shalini.S1, Dr. S. Venkatesh (2025); A STUDY ON ASPECTS MOTIVATING THE USE OF BALANCE SCORECARD IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECTOR IN BENGALURU, International Research Stars, ISSN: 2583-276X, V4, I3, Pp: 1-11.